So. I'm reading a post over at
Edward's blog about the (sometimes uncontrollable) urge to touch artwork. As someone who handles artwork on a daily basis this was bound to catch my attention and, for the most part, I found the post interesting.
Reading the comments was another experience altogether. The majority of the commenter's felt that museums and galleries stifled their ability to
engage with the artwork by, essentially, preventing them from physically interacting with the collection objects.
I know ~ boggles the mind, doesn't it. You should go over & read the comments. There was endless carping about overprotective guards & annoying motion alarms. Of course they're annoying: the alarm is usually there and the guard is hovering because some idiot has decided at some point to
interact with the piece!
I know it's old-school of me & goes against the grain of current museum education practice, yet I can not help but wonder if there
some connection between an increase of man-made damage to museum artwork and the current use of interactives. Would it not seem to encourage unwanted physical contact? Turn the museum into a playground & visitors (and I'm not just talking about children here) will think they can touch everything. Has everyone forgotten that it is quite easy to interact with artwork using two simple things: one's eyes & one's brain? The lack of respect & manners demonstrated by far too many visitors to cultural institutions these days is appalling. The stories I could tell you about the stupid senseless damage I've seen...
I don't expect the general public to know the complexities of correct art handling & conservation. Really I don't.
I do, however, expect them to know the difference between a museum & flea market.